December 12, 2022

Alex Berke quoted in the Albany Law Review: Applying New York City Human Rights Law to Salary Negotiation

Salary negotiations are not an easy task for job candidates or employers, even more so for women job candidates. Federally, equal pay is protected by the Equal Pay Act of 1963 which protects against wage discrimination based on sex. Similar protections exist within the New York City Human Rights Law. Geeta Tewari, an Assistant Professor of Law at ​​Widener University Delaware Law School, utilized the New York City Human Rights Law as a case study to show how local governments can help frame salary negotiation as a protected human right and discussed the challenges of salary negotiations.

By law, employees are allowed to discuss their salaries with fellow employees. Oftentimes, these conversations result in the discovery of pay inequity. As Alex Berke said for the law review “The longer it takes for employers to “deal with it”, the more motivated people become to file a complaint with the Human Rights Commission. The behavior does not need to be explicit in order for it to be illegal under the NYC Human Rights Law.

In NYC, the Human Rights Commission can choose to take on a case itself and conduct an independent investigation. According to Alex Berke: “When the Commission decides to take on a case, it forces employers to take the claim more seriously because they are then unable to simply offer a settlement.” NYC offers means of recourse for employers and employees to come to a mutually acceptable agreement to either continue in the workplace or leave in a positive way.

Read Geeta Tewari’s piece here for more information on the impact of the New York City Human Rights Law on pay equity.  

 

white line

The Rhetoric of Choice Obscures Our Social Obligations to Parents

January 30, 2020
Paid Family Leave
FMLA
Pregnancy Discrimination
Leave
Who should foot the bill or take responsibility for social reproduction as more women were pressed into the workforce, government or the individual? In the US, the answer was resounding: the individual. And this has had significant consequences for working parents since. By placing the responsibility on the individual, almost always the mother, parents have been in a bind for decades and any "choices" available reside in an astonishingly thin sliver of options constrained by structural inequalities

Female Flight Attendants and Pilots File Discrimination Suit Against Frontier Airlines, Alleging Discrimination against Pregnant and Nursing Mothers

January 13, 2020
Gender Discrimination
Pregnancy Discrimination
Two lawsuits were filed against Frontier airlines alleging that the Company required pregnant employees to suspend work duties months before they were scheduled to give birth, forcing employees to use their vacation days in lieu of paid time off, take unpaid maternity leave without Frontier providing alternatives for work, and refuse to accommodate breastfeeding and pregnant workers.

New Report from Uber Highlights the Risks of Driving in the Gig Economy

January 6, 2020
Sexual Harassment
Among the most significant risks to Uber drivers were those in the form of sexual and physical assault on the job, with 42% of assault cases being reported by drivers. The most common assault reported by drivers and riders was "non-consensual touching of a sexual body part," with 1,560 cases reported in 2018 alone.

Get In Touch

Knowing where to turn in legal matters can make a big difference. Contact our employment lawyers to determine if we can help you.