December 19, 2016
No items found.

Using New York State Consumer Protections to Get Insurers to Pay Bills

The election has created change and uncertainty around national health care laws, making now a good time for New Yorkers to understand state-based laws that protect us as health care consumers. New York State law contains consumer protections that can help individuals have care paid for by their insurer, avoiding large unreimbursed bills incurred by providers. Demystifying these legal rights can save insureds — and their advocates — time, money, and frustration, allowing them to focus on their health, instead of the cost of health care.

New Yorkers who get their private health insurance from a plan that is covered by New York law, whether that plan comes from an employer or the Marketplace, have four crucial consumer protections:

  • Transitional care laws allow individuals to continue receiving insurance coverage for seeing their doctor, even if that doctor is no longer covered by their insurance;
  • Appealing denials of care and payment from insurance companies;
  • Network adequacy protections requiring insurers to have enough providers of different types for their enrollees to access;
  • Surprise Bill law protecting consumers from paying certain out-of-network bills.

Our associate, Alex Berke’s recently published article in the New York State Bar Association Health Law Journal, “Using Health Insurance Consumer Protections To Increase Reimbursements For Providers and Decrease Out-of-Pocket Costs For Consumers,” examines these laws in depth, including how using them wisely can get a bill paid.

Changes are undoubtedly coming for the health insurance market, but not all relevant laws are Federal, and as New Yorkers, we should use the consumer protections we have to get the best value for our health insurance dollars.

white line

The Week in FFCRA Complaints: Yet More Wrongful Terminations and Retaliation

August 10, 2020
Leave
Disability Discrimination
As we noted last week, employers seem not to have gotten the message on paid leave under FFCRA and the two notable cases that came up this week both involve employer retaliation and wrongful termination against employees who were protected under FFCRA.

The Berke-Weiss Law Weekly Roundup: Black Pregnancy in New York City and School Reopening Reversals

August 10, 2020
Race Discrimination
Pregnancy Discrimination
We’re now a week into the expiration of the enhanced unemployment benefits of the CARES Act and the news is not good. Congress and the White House remain at least a trillion of dollars apart on a new deal, with the Senate GOP split, though their prized bit of the CARES Act, the corporate bailout, did not have an expiration date, unlike those parts aimed at protecting workers, such as the PUA and eviction moratoriums. Thus, with depressing predictability, there were a spate of alarming stories this week echoing the fears that tenant unions and activists have been voicing for months: by ending employment relief we are hurtling toward a cliff, over which lies massive, nationwide evictions.

The Week in FFCRA Complaints: Employers Do Not Seem to Understand Mandated Worker Protections

July 31, 2020
Leave
Disability Discrimination
t is starting to seem, from our perspective, that either employers have not been made sufficiently aware of the leave entitled to workers under the FFCRA or that they are willing to risk a lawsuit for wrongful termination.

Get In Touch

Knowing where to turn in legal matters can make a big difference. Contact our employment lawyers to determine if we can help you.