January 30, 2020
No items found.

NYC Commission on Human Rights Clarifies Work Protections for Independent Contractors and Freelancers

The labor rights of freelancers and independent contractors have been much in the news recently. In California for example, a law passed in 2019, which came into effect January 1, codified a California Supreme Court ruling in the case Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court about the status of gig economy workers. The gist of AB5 was to place the burden of proving workers are independent contractors onto employers, which aimed to put pressure on Uber, Lyft and other "gig-economy" companies who have been exploiting their workers' statuses as independent contractors to avoid employers' legal obligations to their workers.

Concern over the welfare and employment rights has not been confined to the country's most populous state, however. New York City's Commission On Human Rights has published new information for freelancers and contractors working in the city. The Commission's goal is to elaborate and clarify who qualifies as a freelancer under the law, and to inform them of their rights and protections. These were expanded by amendments to a city law passed by the City Council in the fall of 2019.

This guidance is also designed for employers to understand who qualifies for protections and what their obligations to contractors are. Companies with 15 or more employees that employ contractors who work 80 or more hours in a year and at least 90 days are required by law to provide employment and sexual harassment training to contractors, for example.

The expanded law also provides contractors with protection against various types of discrimination, including the prohibition of the use of credit checks or inquiries into previous salary rates during the hiring process, making employers liable for discriminatory practices, and the provision of reasonable accommodations for contractors and other employees, such as making lactation rooms available for nursing mothers.

white line

The Week in FFCRA Complaints: Yet More Wrongful Terminations and Retaliation

August 10, 2020
Leave
Disability Discrimination
As we noted last week, employers seem not to have gotten the message on paid leave under FFCRA and the two notable cases that came up this week both involve employer retaliation and wrongful termination against employees who were protected under FFCRA.

The Berke-Weiss Law Weekly Roundup: Black Pregnancy in New York City and School Reopening Reversals

August 10, 2020
Race Discrimination
Pregnancy Discrimination
We’re now a week into the expiration of the enhanced unemployment benefits of the CARES Act and the news is not good. Congress and the White House remain at least a trillion of dollars apart on a new deal, with the Senate GOP split, though their prized bit of the CARES Act, the corporate bailout, did not have an expiration date, unlike those parts aimed at protecting workers, such as the PUA and eviction moratoriums. Thus, with depressing predictability, there were a spate of alarming stories this week echoing the fears that tenant unions and activists have been voicing for months: by ending employment relief we are hurtling toward a cliff, over which lies massive, nationwide evictions.

The Week in FFCRA Complaints: Employers Do Not Seem to Understand Mandated Worker Protections

July 31, 2020
Leave
Disability Discrimination
t is starting to seem, from our perspective, that either employers have not been made sufficiently aware of the leave entitled to workers under the FFCRA or that they are willing to risk a lawsuit for wrongful termination.

Get In Touch

Knowing where to turn in legal matters can make a big difference. Contact our employment lawyers to determine if we can help you.