May 15, 2020
No items found.

Early Discrimination Lawsuits Under Families First Act Highlight Potential New Front in Employment Discrimination

Stephanie Jones, director of revenue management for Eastern Airlines, is one of the first people to file a lawsuit under the newly enacted Families First Coronavirus Response Act. Jones alleges that Eastern Airlines violated the Act by firing her instead of providing her several hours a day for childcare management after her 11-year-old son’s Pennsylvania school closed due to coronavirus. 

The Families First Act stipulates that employers must give employee-parents whose children’s day care facilities or schools closed in response to coronavirus paid leave if they cannot work remotely. It came into effect on April 1, and it requires employers to provide up to 10 weeks of partially paid family leave as well as leave to medical workers.

As we have previously highlighted, childcare has become increasingly precarious for many workers, whether they are low-wage, “essential” workers or those who have been furloughed or are working from home. Few facilities have remained open for fear of contributing to the outbreak, leaving parents in the difficult position of choosing between family and employment, often an impossible choice with the pressures of meeting rent, buying food, and ensuring families maintain their health care coverage.

Although Jones’s case is one of the first suits brought post-outbreak, her issue is an all-too-familiar one, which the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has been tracking for years. Since the EEOC’s guidance, released in 2007, there has been an even greater uptick in the number of caregivers who are employed and concomitant discrimination cases, according to a 2016 study conducted by the Center for Worklife Law.  

Legal experts and observers expect that Jones’s case is only the tip of the iceberg regarding caregiver discrimination because of coronavirus. It is also a growing field of struggle in employment discrimination, as conflicts between employers and caregivers increase there will surely be more legal and legislative battles over rights and provisions regarding family responsibilities discrimination.

white line

The Week in FFCRA Complaints: Yet More Wrongful Terminations and Retaliation

August 10, 2020
Leave
Disability Discrimination
As we noted last week, employers seem not to have gotten the message on paid leave under FFCRA and the two notable cases that came up this week both involve employer retaliation and wrongful termination against employees who were protected under FFCRA.

The Berke-Weiss Law Weekly Roundup: Black Pregnancy in New York City and School Reopening Reversals

August 10, 2020
Race Discrimination
Pregnancy Discrimination
We’re now a week into the expiration of the enhanced unemployment benefits of the CARES Act and the news is not good. Congress and the White House remain at least a trillion of dollars apart on a new deal, with the Senate GOP split, though their prized bit of the CARES Act, the corporate bailout, did not have an expiration date, unlike those parts aimed at protecting workers, such as the PUA and eviction moratoriums. Thus, with depressing predictability, there were a spate of alarming stories this week echoing the fears that tenant unions and activists have been voicing for months: by ending employment relief we are hurtling toward a cliff, over which lies massive, nationwide evictions.

The Week in FFCRA Complaints: Employers Do Not Seem to Understand Mandated Worker Protections

July 31, 2020
Leave
Disability Discrimination
t is starting to seem, from our perspective, that either employers have not been made sufficiently aware of the leave entitled to workers under the FFCRA or that they are willing to risk a lawsuit for wrongful termination.

Get In Touch

Knowing where to turn in legal matters can make a big difference. Contact our employment lawyers to determine if we can help you.