April 1, 2024
No items found.

Congress and Lawsuit Threaten NLRB’s Joint Employer Rule

In October of 2023, the National Labor Relations Board issued a final rule pertaining to joint employment, which has drawn significant backlash from congress, which resulted in the House of Representatives utilizing its powers to issue a resolution overturning the NLRB’s rule. According to sources, should the resolution make it out of the senate, the president will veto it.

The NLRB’s rule on joint employers created a new standard to help determine joint employment status for workers, rescinding a rule passed by the previous NLRB in 2020. The new standard stipulates:

- an entity may be considered a joint employer of a group of employees if each

- entity has an employment relationship with the employees and they share or codetermine one or more of the employees’ essential terms and conditions of employment, which are defined exclusively as: (1) wages, benefits, and other compensation; (2) hours of work and scheduling; (3) the assignment of duties to be performed; (4) the supervision of the performance of duties; (5) work rules and directions governing the manner, means, and methods of the performance of duties and the grounds for discipline; (6) the tenure of employment, including hiring and discharge; and (7) working conditions related to the safety and health of employees.

This rule would aid many non-unionized workplaces and sectors, providing increased worker power to those who are employed by subcontractors, a situation in which millions of American workers find themselves.

The rule is primarily opposed by Congressional Republicans who argue it creates undue burdens on small business owners and could stymie job growth although several Democrats, including Senator Joe Manchin have voiced their disdain for the rule and have vowed to fight it.

Outside the capitol building, the rule also faces a lawsuit from a panoply of business groups, including the Chamber of Commerce and lobbies representing the hospitality and retail industries, among others. In February a Texas judge required the effective date of the rule be pushed back into March.

white line

With Michael Bloomberg in the Race, It's Time We Talk About NDAs (again)

February 25, 2020
Pregnancy Discrimination
Sexual Harassment
In 2018, Governor Cuomo signed a law that banned many NDAs and mandatory arbitration for complaints, but some activists and policymakers argued that the state had focused too narrowly on sexual harassment, and the 2019 laws expanded the 2018 laws to include protections against NDAs in other forms of workplace discrimination.

The Postpartum Ad the Oscars Wouldn't Run

February 24, 2020
Pregnancy Discrimination
Paid Family Leave
Sometimes reality is too real for Hollywood and the culture machine, as was demonstrated when ABC and the Academy decided not to air an ad dealing straightforwardly with the reality of postpartum life. The ad for Frida Mom, a retailer in the baby and new mother field, depicted a women confronting in a realistic manner the stress and changes that occur for new mothers.

Associate Alex Berke quoted in Mother Jones on Defamation and Sexual Harassment

February 18, 2020
Sexual Harassment
Alex Berke, an employment lawyer in New York, says she asks men what their goal is when they come to her after being accused of sexual harassment. Will a lawsuit really stop people from talking about them?

Get In Touch

Knowing where to turn in legal matters can make a big difference. Contact our employment lawyers to determine if we can help you.