April 1, 2024
No items found.

Congress and Lawsuit Threaten NLRB’s Joint Employer Rule

In October of 2023, the National Labor Relations Board issued a final rule pertaining to joint employment, which has drawn significant backlash from congress, which resulted in the House of Representatives utilizing its powers to issue a resolution overturning the NLRB’s rule. According to sources, should the resolution make it out of the senate, the president will veto it.

The NLRB’s rule on joint employers created a new standard to help determine joint employment status for workers, rescinding a rule passed by the previous NLRB in 2020. The new standard stipulates:

- an entity may be considered a joint employer of a group of employees if each

- entity has an employment relationship with the employees and they share or codetermine one or more of the employees’ essential terms and conditions of employment, which are defined exclusively as: (1) wages, benefits, and other compensation; (2) hours of work and scheduling; (3) the assignment of duties to be performed; (4) the supervision of the performance of duties; (5) work rules and directions governing the manner, means, and methods of the performance of duties and the grounds for discipline; (6) the tenure of employment, including hiring and discharge; and (7) working conditions related to the safety and health of employees.

This rule would aid many non-unionized workplaces and sectors, providing increased worker power to those who are employed by subcontractors, a situation in which millions of American workers find themselves.

The rule is primarily opposed by Congressional Republicans who argue it creates undue burdens on small business owners and could stymie job growth although several Democrats, including Senator Joe Manchin have voiced their disdain for the rule and have vowed to fight it.

Outside the capitol building, the rule also faces a lawsuit from a panoply of business groups, including the Chamber of Commerce and lobbies representing the hospitality and retail industries, among others. In February a Texas judge required the effective date of the rule be pushed back into March.

white line

The Rhetoric of Choice Obscures Our Social Obligations to Parents

January 30, 2020
Paid Family Leave
FMLA
Pregnancy Discrimination
Leave
Who should foot the bill or take responsibility for social reproduction as more women were pressed into the workforce, government or the individual? In the US, the answer was resounding: the individual. And this has had significant consequences for working parents since. By placing the responsibility on the individual, almost always the mother, parents have been in a bind for decades and any "choices" available reside in an astonishingly thin sliver of options constrained by structural inequalities

Female Flight Attendants and Pilots File Discrimination Suit Against Frontier Airlines, Alleging Discrimination against Pregnant and Nursing Mothers

January 13, 2020
Gender Discrimination
Pregnancy Discrimination
Two lawsuits were filed against Frontier airlines alleging that the Company required pregnant employees to suspend work duties months before they were scheduled to give birth, forcing employees to use their vacation days in lieu of paid time off, take unpaid maternity leave without Frontier providing alternatives for work, and refuse to accommodate breastfeeding and pregnant workers.

New Report from Uber Highlights the Risks of Driving in the Gig Economy

January 6, 2020
Sexual Harassment
Among the most significant risks to Uber drivers were those in the form of sexual and physical assault on the job, with 42% of assault cases being reported by drivers. The most common assault reported by drivers and riders was "non-consensual touching of a sexual body part," with 1,560 cases reported in 2018 alone.

Get In Touch

Knowing where to turn in legal matters can make a big difference. Contact our employment lawyers to determine if we can help you.