January 19, 2023
No items found.

Federal Trade Commission Proposes Ban on Non-Compete Clauses in an Effort to Protect Employees

On January 5, 2023, the Federal Trade Commission— an independent government agency tasked with enforcing civil antitrust laws and promoting consumer protection— proposed a rule to ban non-compete clauses in the United States. The FTC proposed the ban in an effort to protect employees from agreements that place unfair limitations on members of the workforce and stifle entrepreneurship and competition. According to the FTC, approximately one in five workers is currently subject to a non-compete.

Non-compete clauses are contractual agreements that limit or prohibit workers from seeking or accepting particular employment, or operating a business, once they leave their current employer. Usually, non-compete clauses have temporal and geographical restrictions and are used by employers to protect proprietary information, reduce labor turnover and to discourage direct competition from former employees. Nevertheless, these clauses can not only inhibit workers from freely leaving their employment, but can result in restraints on pay, entrepreneurship and professional development. Noncompete clauses are generally regulated on a state-by-state basis where some states, including California, North Dakota and Oklahoma, wholly prohibit the enforcement of non-compete clauses. 

This proposed rule, if enforced, may propel employers to seek alternative methods to achieve the same results as a non-compete clause. Non-disclosure agreements, non-solicitation agreements and enforcing trade-secret laws may be useful tools, but likely won’t have as protective an effect for employer’s as non-compete clauses do.  

The proposed rule is open for public comment for a period of 60 days. Once changes are considered following the public comment period, should  a final rule be issued the FTC should certainly expect legal pushback from businesses and employers. 

white line

The Berke-Weiss Law Weekly Roundup, PUA Running Out, Why It Took So Long to Recognize the Child Care Crisis, and New Workers Councils

July 24, 2020
No items found.
This week marks a significant juncture for the US as Pandemic Unemployment Assistance is scheduled to end next week, schools are considering how to safely serve students, and workplaces continue to grapple with safety concerns.

Dueling Congressional Plans to Bailout US Childcare

July 21, 2020
No items found.
By now, the fact that childcare is in crisis is not new. But as the weeks creep by it is crystallizing as one of the signal problems of the pandemic lockdowns. Without childcare, which includes open K-12 schools, parents, child care workers, day care providers, and a host of others have been deeply affected. As Congress prepares to reconvene and wrangle over a new set of stimulus payments, a boost to the childcare industry is front and center.

The Week in FFCRA Cases Includes Multiple Worker Complaints in the Food Supply Sector

July 17, 2020
Disability Discrimination
The three cases highlighted in this weeks’ FFCRA complaint roundup include two filed by plaintiffs working in restaurants and another from a plaintiff employed in food distribution. Because the entire food supply chain has been deemed essential, workers in the industry have little ability to leave work to care for sick family members or children since the childcare industry cratered.

Get In Touch

Knowing where to turn in legal matters can make a big difference. Contact our employment lawyers to determine if we can help you.