June 12, 2023

Menopause Set to Be Next Frontier in Workplace Accommodations

A growing awareness of the seriousness of menopause is forcing employers to evaluate how they help accommodate women who are entering it, the New York Times reports. While still too often treated as a taboo subject, even by physicians, more and more women are speaking frankly about the condition and how it affects their lives, including their employment.

As the Times reports, things are beginning to change at large national and multinational corporations, thanks in large part to a movement taking off in England. There, companies like HSBC and Unilever are now certified as “menopause-friendly” by a training firm in England. But the conversation has gone beyond these types of voluntary certification with parliament debating how the national government can create more comprehensive guidance and policies for employers.

This momentum is influencing workers in the United States, which so far lags behind England. Recently, New York City mayor, Eric Adams, has stated that the city must break the stigma of menopause and build better policies and accommodations for workers in the city.

Adams, and other politicians like him, are riding a wave of celebrities and entrepreneurs who are bringing honest discussions of menopause into the mainstream, often highlighting the economic effects menopause has, with one study from the Mayo Clinic estimating that menopause has cost employers nearly $2 billion in lost productivity. Others have estimated the costs could be as great as $1 trillion. Many women report having had to take time off of work to deal with symptoms

Changes remain in their infancy, however, and large-scale changes to employment policies will require concerted efforts by activists, workers, policy makers and politicians, but the conversation has at least started.

Read the New York Times' article here.

The Berke-Weiss Law Weekly Roundup: While the Outlook Darkens, We Celebrate Some Small Victories

July 31, 2020
No items found.
The clock has essentially wound down on extending assistance for the 30+ million Americans currently on the unemployment rolls. White House officials and Congressional Democrats remain miles apart, with the latter rejecting a temporary extension of the benefits. There are also huge question marks over issues we focus on, particularly child care and employment law, both of which were in the news this week and are the subject of several of the stories we feature

With the HEALS Act the Fight over Pandemic Lawsuits Takes Center Stage

July 30, 2020
No items found.
Earlier this week, Senate GOP leadership introduced their $1 trillion opening response to the $3 trillion Congressional HEROES Act, originally proposed in May. As we have noted, the signal demand coming from Mitch McConnell’s office is liability protection (the “L” in HEALS) for businesses and health care organizations. Translated, McConnell wants to prevent workers from suing employers if they contract coronavirus at work. And the GOP appears firm that without consensus on this issue, there will be no new stimulus.

The Week in FFCRA Cases Includes a Class Action Suit against the USDA

July 24, 2020
Leave
Four cases came across the wire this week and we have chosen to highlight them all. One case is the first class action lawsuit filed under the FFCRA and concerns potentially millions of people seeking SNAP aid. The three other suits that were filed this week follow a familiar line for anyone who has been reading our updates. People are getting sick or have family members getting sick and are then denied their right to paid leave and are terminated.

Get In Touch

Knowing where to turn in legal matters can make a big difference. Contact our employment lawyers to determine if we can help you.