December 19, 2016

Pregnant Workers Should Know Their Rights

When New York City’s Pregnant Workers Fairness Act went into affect in early 2014, its aim was to provide employees with reasonable accommodations for pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions, as long as the accommodation allows the employee to perform the essential functions of the job. But, as a recent New York Times article highlights, some women still face pregnancy discrimination at work. The article focuses on the story of Angelica Valencia, a 39-year old woman who was three months pregnant and working at a potato packing plant in the Bronx. Because of a high risk pregnancy, her doctor told her that she could not work more than 8 hours a day. But, when Valencia gave her employer a doctor’s note indicating that she could not work overtime, her employer was unable to provide an accommodation, and she was ultimately forced out of her job.

Like many women in low-paying jobs, Valencia did not know about her rights under the New York City’s Pregnant Workers Fairness Act. In an effort to educate individuals about this law, officials from the New York City Commission on Human Rights and women’s rights advocates have been speaking to business groups, doctors, nurses, and union representatives to ensure that women know about their rights and that employers know their obligations under the law. In fact, the law specifies that employees must be informed in writing of their rights under the statute. For more information regarding New York City’s Pregnant Workers Fairness Act, you can speak to an experienced labor and employment attorney at Berke-Weiss Law PLLC.

white line

The Berke-Weiss Law Weekly Roundup: Black Pregnancy in New York City and School Reopening Reversals

August 10, 2020
Race Discrimination
Pregnancy Discrimination
We’re now a week into the expiration of the enhanced unemployment benefits of the CARES Act and the news is not good. Congress and the White House remain at least a trillion of dollars apart on a new deal, with the Senate GOP split, though their prized bit of the CARES Act, the corporate bailout, did not have an expiration date, unlike those parts aimed at protecting workers, such as the PUA and eviction moratoriums. Thus, with depressing predictability, there were a spate of alarming stories this week echoing the fears that tenant unions and activists have been voicing for months: by ending employment relief we are hurtling toward a cliff, over which lies massive, nationwide evictions.

The Week in FFCRA Complaints: Employers Do Not Seem to Understand Mandated Worker Protections

July 31, 2020
Leave
Disability Discrimination
t is starting to seem, from our perspective, that either employers have not been made sufficiently aware of the leave entitled to workers under the FFCRA or that they are willing to risk a lawsuit for wrongful termination.

The Berke-Weiss Law Weekly Roundup: While the Outlook Darkens, We Celebrate Some Small Victories

July 31, 2020
No items found.
The clock has essentially wound down on extending assistance for the 30+ million Americans currently on the unemployment rolls. White House officials and Congressional Democrats remain miles apart, with the latter rejecting a temporary extension of the benefits. There are also huge question marks over issues we focus on, particularly child care and employment law, both of which were in the news this week and are the subject of several of the stories we feature

Get In Touch

Knowing where to turn in legal matters can make a big difference. Contact our employment lawyers to determine if we can help you.