December 19, 2016
No items found.

Using New York State Consumer Protections to Get Insurers to Pay Bills

The election has created change and uncertainty around national health care laws, making now a good time for New Yorkers to understand state-based laws that protect us as health care consumers. New York State law contains consumer protections that can help individuals have care paid for by their insurer, avoiding large unreimbursed bills incurred by providers. Demystifying these legal rights can save insureds — and their advocates — time, money, and frustration, allowing them to focus on their health, instead of the cost of health care.

New Yorkers who get their private health insurance from a plan that is covered by New York law, whether that plan comes from an employer or the Marketplace, have four crucial consumer protections:

  • Transitional care laws allow individuals to continue receiving insurance coverage for seeing their doctor, even if that doctor is no longer covered by their insurance;
  • Appealing denials of care and payment from insurance companies;
  • Network adequacy protections requiring insurers to have enough providers of different types for their enrollees to access;
  • Surprise Bill law protecting consumers from paying certain out-of-network bills.

Our associate, Alex Berke’s recently published article in the New York State Bar Association Health Law Journal, “Using Health Insurance Consumer Protections To Increase Reimbursements For Providers and Decrease Out-of-Pocket Costs For Consumers,” examines these laws in depth, including how using them wisely can get a bill paid.

Changes are undoubtedly coming for the health insurance market, but not all relevant laws are Federal, and as New Yorkers, we should use the consumer protections we have to get the best value for our health insurance dollars.

white line

The Berke-Weiss Law Weekly Roundup: While the Outlook Darkens, We Celebrate Some Small Victories

July 31, 2020
No items found.
The clock has essentially wound down on extending assistance for the 30+ million Americans currently on the unemployment rolls. White House officials and Congressional Democrats remain miles apart, with the latter rejecting a temporary extension of the benefits. There are also huge question marks over issues we focus on, particularly child care and employment law, both of which were in the news this week and are the subject of several of the stories we feature

With the HEALS Act the Fight over Pandemic Lawsuits Takes Center Stage

July 30, 2020
No items found.
Earlier this week, Senate GOP leadership introduced their $1 trillion opening response to the $3 trillion Congressional HEROES Act, originally proposed in May. As we have noted, the signal demand coming from Mitch McConnell’s office is liability protection (the “L” in HEALS) for businesses and health care organizations. Translated, McConnell wants to prevent workers from suing employers if they contract coronavirus at work. And the GOP appears firm that without consensus on this issue, there will be no new stimulus.

The Week in FFCRA Cases Includes a Class Action Suit against the USDA

July 24, 2020
Leave
Four cases came across the wire this week and we have chosen to highlight them all. One case is the first class action lawsuit filed under the FFCRA and concerns potentially millions of people seeking SNAP aid. The three other suits that were filed this week follow a familiar line for anyone who has been reading our updates. People are getting sick or have family members getting sick and are then denied their right to paid leave and are terminated.

Get In Touch

Knowing where to turn in legal matters can make a big difference. Contact our employment lawyers to determine if we can help you.