January 2, 2018

Different Understandings of Sexual Harassment

It’s clear that we are experiencing a unique cultural moment regarding sex harassment in the workplace. News stories about accused harassers break daily in the news, and the “silence breakers” were named Time Magazine’s Person of the Year. Amidst this constant conversation, a recent Reuters poll demonstrates that not everyone in the workplace has the same understanding of what constitutes sexual harassment.

The poll found that most adults agree that intentional groping or kissing “without your consent” is considered sexual harassment. People were more divided over whether “unwanted compliments about your appearance” or “dirty jokes” would be considered sexual harassment. Under the law, any of these acts can be considered sexual harassment. This poll illustrates a challenge employer’s face: ensuring that their employees behave lawfully both to protect all employees and to lower the employers risk of a lawsuit.

Interestingly, a survey by the New York Times found that 25% of men surveyed admitted to performing one action that could be classified as sexual harassment in their workplace by: telling inappropriate jokes or stories; making sexist remarks; showing sexual material; engaging in unwanted sex talk; making gestures; asking someone on a date after they said no; asking someone to be in a relationship after saying no; touching someone; stroking someone, or; sexually coercing a co-worker. Many of the men did not identify those behaviors as "harassing."

People’s perceptions of what constitutes sexual harassment are not completely in sync with their co-workers or with the law. Clear training and workplace policies are critical to ensure that employees all understand what is acceptable in the workplace.

Employers: contact us to conduct training and update policies

EMPLOYEES: Contact us if you are dealing with sex harassment at work

white line

In an Uncommon Move, McDonald’s Sues Former CEO

August 20, 2020
Sexual Harassment
It’s not every day that a blue chip company decides to sue a former executive, let alone its erstwhile CEO, but this is exactly what McDonald’s did by suing Steve Easterbrook, who had been fired last year for inappropriate conduct, specifically, sexting with an employee.

The Art of the Doctor’s Note

August 19, 2020
Pregnancy Discrimination
We’ve all needed one at some point –– a doctor’s note explaining that we’re out for the count on some otherwise necessary aspect of work or school, at least temporarily. Many people are realizing that because of COVID, they don’t feel safe at work due to a disability, and need to modify their pre-pandemic job to accommodate this new reality. In this type of situation, what do you ask your doctor for? What does such a note need to include to help you successfully advocate for your rights?

The Week in FFCRA Cases: Judge Invalidates DOL Implementation, Expanding Eligibility

August 18, 2020
Disability Discrimination
Leave
The complaints we found relevant this week are eerily similar—parents who need to take care of their children, some of whom are immunocompromised, are being denied telework or leave or are being terminated. Further, we are continuing to see plaintiffs who voice concerns to their employers about workplace safety being terminated after doing so.

Get In Touch

Knowing where to turn in legal matters can make a big difference. Contact our employment lawyers to determine if we can help you.