November 27, 2019

Gender Discrimination in Bathroom Access

New York State and New York City laws prohibit employment discrimination with regards to bathroom choice. On February 24, 2019, New York State passed the Gender Expression Non-Discrimination Act (GENDA), amending the New York State Human Rights Law. Under GENDA, it is unlawful to refuse someone access to a single-sex restroom, or other single-sex facilities, appropriate to their gender identity. For example, if a person chooses to use the women’s room because they identify as a woman, though they were born a man, they cannot be required to use the men’s room.

Under the New York City Human Rights Law, all people have the right to use the single-gender facilities, such as bathrooms or locker rooms, most closely aligned with their gender identity or expression, regardless of their gender expression, sex assigned at birth, anatomy, medical history, or the sex indicated on their identification. NYCHRL’s guidance on Gender Identity and Gender Expression suggests creating policies and mandating trainings on compliance with this policy. Further, the guidance suggests having gender-neutral, single occupancy restrooms to help avoid violations of the NYCHRL to accommodate a person’s request to use a single-occupancy restroom because of their gender, or as an alternative for any individuals who may “express discomfort” from sharing a facility with a transgender, non-binary, or gender non-conforming person. Importantly, it is unlawful to require a person to use a single-occupancy restroom because they are transgender, non-binary, or non-conforming.  

Additionally, New York City’s Local Law 79 requires all single-occupant restrooms in New York City to be gender-neutral. The law requires signs be posted on the bathrooms indicating that it is for all sexes. The law does not mandate the construction of single-occupant bathrooms or require any physical alterations to any existing single-occupant toilet rooms, except for the posting and maintenance of appropriate signage as required. Individuals cannot be discriminated against due to their choice for using a gender-neutral bathroom.

Employers should be aware of the potential liability under these laws. Under the State Human Rights Law, employees covered in the State can bring a claim within one year after alleged discriminatory conduct for compensatory and punitive damages, and civil penalties may be imposed. Under the City Human Rights Law, covered employees in the City can bring a claim for gender-based harassment with the Commission’s Law Enforcement Bureau or in court within three years of the discriminatory act for compensatory and punitive damages, and civil penalties may be imposed. Building owners in violation of Local Law 79 may have fines imposed, may be required to appear before the City’s Environmental Control Board, and must correct the violation.

Creating clear policies prohibiting discriminatory access to single-gender facilities, training employees on these policies, and creating gender-neutral restrooms could help avoid violations of these laws. However, employers cannot force someone to use a single-occupancy restroom because of their gender or gender-identity.

Employers are not the only ones who need to worry about liability for gender identity discrimination. Statewide reporting on harassment incidents in New York public schools between 2010 and 2015 showed that 19% of harassment incidents were related to a student’s sex, gender, or sexual orientation. The New York State Human Rights Law protects all transgender individuals across the state, including those in schools. Further, the City’s Guidance, in providing examples of violations of the Human Rights Law, include a public university prohibiting a transgender man from using the men’s restroom, and barring a non-binary student from a single-gender after-school program. All transgender individuals, from employees to students, are protected against unlawful gender identity discrimination in both New York State and New York City.

 Written by Emily Entwistle

white line

The Week in FFCRA Cases Includes Multiple Worker Complaints in the Food Supply Sector

July 17, 2020
Disability Discrimination
The three cases highlighted in this weeks’ FFCRA complaint roundup include two filed by plaintiffs working in restaurants and another from a plaintiff employed in food distribution. Because the entire food supply chain has been deemed essential, workers in the industry have little ability to leave work to care for sick family members or children since the childcare industry cratered.

The Berke-Weiss Law Weekly Roundup: School Reopenings and Employer Liability among Hot-button Issues

July 17, 2020
No items found.
This week includes updates on the latest roadblocks at another round of stimulus, which remains necessary as more than 30 million Americans remain out of work, officially, and countless more are shut out of the social welfare programs offered in the US. We also highlight school re-openings and general Covid risk analysis.

New Study Finds Sexual Harassment Pervasive in the Legal Professions

July 15, 2020
Sexual Harassment
Taking a break from the wall-to-wall imperative that is coronavirus, we wanted to highlight a new study about workplace cultures in the legal practice. Conducted by the Women Lawyers on Guard, the study Still Broken: Sexual Harassment and Misconduct in the Legal Profession shows that sexual harassment plagues women at all levels of the legal profession, from early-career lawyers to judges, and everyone in between.

Get In Touch

Knowing where to turn in legal matters can make a big difference. Contact our employment lawyers to determine if we can help you.