July 31, 2020

The Week in FFCRA Complaints: Employers Do Not Seem to Understand Mandated Worker Protections

It’s time once again for our weekly dose of FFCRA complaints here at the Berke-Weiss Law blog. It is starting to seem, from our perspective, that either employers have not been made sufficiently aware of the leave entitled to workers under the FFCRA or that they are willing to risk a lawsuit for wrongful termination. The pattern of many of the complaints we’re seeing, and this week is no exception, is an employee notices COVID-19 symptoms, possibly tests positive or at least wants to quarantine to ensure they do not spread it to others, and requests the legally mandated two weeks off plus job protection, yet still gets fired.

  • Complaint, McJunkin v. Lake Keowee Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram, L.L.C., No. 8:20cv2699 (S.D. Ca. July 22, 2020)
  • Plaintiff sued her employer, a car dealership, for retaliation and wrongful termination in violation of FFCRA. Plaintiff became ill from COVID-19 symptoms and was instructed to self-quarantine by her physician. In addition, Plaintiff missed a couple days of work when her child’s daycare closed because of the pandemic. Both of these instances were covered under FFCRA paid leave, but Defendant terminated Plaintiff anyway.
  • Complaint, Voznesensky v. Peninsula Convalescent Assoc., L.L.C., No. 20-CIV-03058 (Cal. Supp. July 22, 2020)
  • Plaintiff, a nurse supervisor, sued her employer, a nursing center, for discrimination, retaliation, and denial of sick leave under FFCRA. Plaintiff tested positive for COVID-19 and alleges she was discriminated against and then terminated because of her illness or perceived disability. Before being diagnosed with COVID-19, Plaintiff repeatedly asked to wear a mask while working but her employer denied her requests. Plaintiff also alleges she was terminated because she complained about her employer about unsafe working conditions. In violation of FFCRA, Plaintiff was also denied paid leave by her employer and believes Defendant acted maliciously against her. 
  • Complaint, Staples-Reynolds v. Gills Gibson, Inc., No. 3:20cv1287 (M.D. Pa. July 28, 2020)
  • Plaintiff, a cook, sued his employer, a restaurant, for retaliation and denial of protected leave under FFCRA. Plaintiff tested positive after contracting COVID-19 from his roommate and was advised by his healthcare provider to self-quarantine for two weeks. He immediately notified his manager who responded by threatening to fire him if he took time off. When Plaintiff left work to self-quarantine, his manager terminated his employment.

Also filed: Complaint, Doler v. Capstone Logistics, L.L.C., No. 3:20cv218 (N.D. Miss. July 28, 2020)

white line

Berke-Weiss Law Weekly Roundup

June 19, 2020
No items found.
In this edition, we’re looking at several employment-related stories, including more news on the childcare front, new considerations for coronavirus workplace safety, as well as some news about a project in which the Firm is participating.

Title VII Now Applies to Gay and Transgender People, the Supreme Court Rules

June 15, 2020
No items found.
In a stunning victory for LGBT employees and the movement at large, the U.S. Supreme Court has held 6-3 that gay and transgender people are protected by Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which bans employment discrimination “because of sex.”

Berke-Weiss Weekly Roundup

June 12, 2020
No items found.
This week we’re highlighting several important developments regarding a return to work and the continued federal failure to properly address workplace safety, as well as more news on the childcare front, and a thoughtful consideration about how the global pandemic could get people thinking about family values in a new light.

Get In Touch

Knowing where to turn in legal matters can make a big difference. Contact our employment lawyers to determine if we can help you.