July 31, 2020

The Week in FFCRA Complaints: Employers Do Not Seem to Understand Mandated Worker Protections

It’s time once again for our weekly dose of FFCRA complaints here at the Berke-Weiss Law blog. It is starting to seem, from our perspective, that either employers have not been made sufficiently aware of the leave entitled to workers under the FFCRA or that they are willing to risk a lawsuit for wrongful termination. The pattern of many of the complaints we’re seeing, and this week is no exception, is an employee notices COVID-19 symptoms, possibly tests positive or at least wants to quarantine to ensure they do not spread it to others, and requests the legally mandated two weeks off plus job protection, yet still gets fired.

  • Complaint, McJunkin v. Lake Keowee Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram, L.L.C., No. 8:20cv2699 (S.D. Ca. July 22, 2020)
  • Plaintiff sued her employer, a car dealership, for retaliation and wrongful termination in violation of FFCRA. Plaintiff became ill from COVID-19 symptoms and was instructed to self-quarantine by her physician. In addition, Plaintiff missed a couple days of work when her child’s daycare closed because of the pandemic. Both of these instances were covered under FFCRA paid leave, but Defendant terminated Plaintiff anyway.
  • Complaint, Voznesensky v. Peninsula Convalescent Assoc., L.L.C., No. 20-CIV-03058 (Cal. Supp. July 22, 2020)
  • Plaintiff, a nurse supervisor, sued her employer, a nursing center, for discrimination, retaliation, and denial of sick leave under FFCRA. Plaintiff tested positive for COVID-19 and alleges she was discriminated against and then terminated because of her illness or perceived disability. Before being diagnosed with COVID-19, Plaintiff repeatedly asked to wear a mask while working but her employer denied her requests. Plaintiff also alleges she was terminated because she complained about her employer about unsafe working conditions. In violation of FFCRA, Plaintiff was also denied paid leave by her employer and believes Defendant acted maliciously against her. 
  • Complaint, Staples-Reynolds v. Gills Gibson, Inc., No. 3:20cv1287 (M.D. Pa. July 28, 2020)
  • Plaintiff, a cook, sued his employer, a restaurant, for retaliation and denial of protected leave under FFCRA. Plaintiff tested positive after contracting COVID-19 from his roommate and was advised by his healthcare provider to self-quarantine for two weeks. He immediately notified his manager who responded by threatening to fire him if he took time off. When Plaintiff left work to self-quarantine, his manager terminated his employment.

Also filed: Complaint, Doler v. Capstone Logistics, L.L.C., No. 3:20cv218 (N.D. Miss. July 28, 2020)

white line

What Employers and Employees Need to Know About the Families First Coronavirus Response Act

March 17, 2020
Leave
What employers and employees need to know about the Families First Coronavirus Response Act, including expansions to the Federal Family Medical Leave Act and provisions for paid sick leave.

Pregnant Women, COVID-19 and Work

March 12, 2020
Pregnancy Discrimination
Gender Discrimination
There currently is no scientific evidence that COVID-19 creates an increased risk for adverse outcomes for pregnant women. That said, pregnant women may be more susceptible to respiratory infections, including COVID-19, and should practice precautions.

Salary Sharing and the Importance of Pay Transparency

March 11, 2020
Gender Discrimination
Pay transparency can effectively mitigate salary discrepancies based on race and gender, especially considering that women and minorities are often at the lower end of the pay grade. While publicizing each individual employee’s salary may create unnecessary animosity, reporting pay bands could be a favorable method of promoting a culture of transparency.

Get In Touch

Knowing where to turn in legal matters can make a big difference. Contact our employment lawyers to determine if we can help you.