October 13, 2020

Princeton to Settle in Gender Pay Inequity Case

Officials at Princeton University have agreed to settle a case regarding pay inequities for 106 full current and former female professors as part of the conclusion of a nearly decade long federal investigation into pay disparities at the university. The Department of Labor’s Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs initiated a review of the university’s compliance with federal standards of equal pay. Although the DoL temporarily suspended the investigation in 2016, it eventually found non-compliance between 2012 and 2014.

The university had fought against the ruling, claiming that the statistical model used by the DoL was flawed and arguing that the investigation and analysis did not reflect the exigencies of Princeton’s hiring and pay scales based on work performed. However, last month, Princeton officials agreed to the settlement, which means paying out nearly $1 million and committing to a comprehensive review of every department’s salaries and hiring practices over the next five years. 

Other aspects of the agreement include training department chairs about pay equity and strengthening the university’s commitment to “enhance the pipeline” of advancing women candidates to full professorships.

While not anomalous, this settlement is uncommon as the federal government has been reticent to investigate or make rulings on university’s pay structures due the the myriad considerations related to a professor’s job duties, which is what Princeton argued initially, claiming that comparing the duties of, for example a physics professor to an English professor was not an appropriate one.


white line

The Berke-Weiss Law Weekly Roundup: Black Pregnancy in New York City and School Reopening Reversals

August 10, 2020
Race Discrimination
Pregnancy Discrimination
We’re now a week into the expiration of the enhanced unemployment benefits of the CARES Act and the news is not good. Congress and the White House remain at least a trillion of dollars apart on a new deal, with the Senate GOP split, though their prized bit of the CARES Act, the corporate bailout, did not have an expiration date, unlike those parts aimed at protecting workers, such as the PUA and eviction moratoriums. Thus, with depressing predictability, there were a spate of alarming stories this week echoing the fears that tenant unions and activists have been voicing for months: by ending employment relief we are hurtling toward a cliff, over which lies massive, nationwide evictions.

The Week in FFCRA Complaints: Employers Do Not Seem to Understand Mandated Worker Protections

July 31, 2020
Leave
Disability Discrimination
t is starting to seem, from our perspective, that either employers have not been made sufficiently aware of the leave entitled to workers under the FFCRA or that they are willing to risk a lawsuit for wrongful termination.

The Berke-Weiss Law Weekly Roundup: While the Outlook Darkens, We Celebrate Some Small Victories

July 31, 2020
No items found.
The clock has essentially wound down on extending assistance for the 30+ million Americans currently on the unemployment rolls. White House officials and Congressional Democrats remain miles apart, with the latter rejecting a temporary extension of the benefits. There are also huge question marks over issues we focus on, particularly child care and employment law, both of which were in the news this week and are the subject of several of the stories we feature

Get In Touch

Knowing where to turn in legal matters can make a big difference. Contact our employment lawyers to determine if we can help you.