January 13, 2020

Female Flight Attendants and Pilots File Discrimination Suit Against Frontier Airlines, Alleging Discrimination against Pregnant and Nursing Mothers

In December, two separate suits were filed against Frontier Airlines by female flight attendants and pilots who allege the company has routinely discriminated against pregnant and nursing employees at the company. Specifically, the suits allege Frontier required pregnant employees to suspend work duties months before they were scheduled to give birth, forcing employees to use their vacation days in lieu of paid time off and take unpaid maternity leave without Frontier providing alternatives for work. In addition to this, the pilots claim that Frontier discriminated against breastfeeding mothers at work, preventing them from pumping while they were in the air. If that sounds like it's a safety concern, the plaintiffs note that it is common practice for a pilot to take bathroom breaks, leaving the copilot in the cockpit, and that a break for pumping would be no different.

The plaintiffs are joined by the ACLU, the ACLU of Colorado, and Towards Justice, who are arguing that Frontier is violating EEOC regulations as well as Colorado state laws designed to protect pregnant and nursing mothers. 

This is not the first time in recent years that such discrimination cases have hit Frontier, with similar complaints being filed in 2016 and 2017. Other airlines have been confronted with similar accusations of discrimination. airlines, with Delta settling one such case in 2017. 

Despite some headway, gender discrimination at work remains a significant issue for women working in the airline industry, as it is in many industries, and one of the most obvious points of contentions is the rights of pregnant or nursing employees, whose only recourse may be to utilize long-term disability rules to find any relief and job security, which is often seen as demeaning and typically comes with lower pay.

white line

New York State Human Rights Law Invoked in Sexual Harassment Arbitration Case

August 11, 2020
Sexual Harassment
A split has appeared in how to handle sexual harassment cases with a New York trial judge ruling recently that the state’s Human Rights Law prevents companies and employees from entering arbitration over sexual harassment. This contradicts an earlier ruling in New York’s Southern District where a judge ruled that arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) supersedes New York’s statutory prohibition against arbitration.

The Week in FFCRA Complaints: Yet More Wrongful Terminations and Retaliation

August 10, 2020
Leave
Disability Discrimination
As we noted last week, employers seem not to have gotten the message on paid leave under FFCRA and the two notable cases that came up this week both involve employer retaliation and wrongful termination against employees who were protected under FFCRA.

The Berke-Weiss Law Weekly Roundup: Black Pregnancy in New York City and School Reopening Reversals

August 10, 2020
Race Discrimination
Pregnancy Discrimination
We’re now a week into the expiration of the enhanced unemployment benefits of the CARES Act and the news is not good. Congress and the White House remain at least a trillion of dollars apart on a new deal, with the Senate GOP split, though their prized bit of the CARES Act, the corporate bailout, did not have an expiration date, unlike those parts aimed at protecting workers, such as the PUA and eviction moratoriums. Thus, with depressing predictability, there were a spate of alarming stories this week echoing the fears that tenant unions and activists have been voicing for months: by ending employment relief we are hurtling toward a cliff, over which lies massive, nationwide evictions.

Get In Touch

Knowing where to turn in legal matters can make a big difference. Contact our employment lawyers to determine if we can help you.