January 13, 2020

Female Flight Attendants and Pilots File Discrimination Suit Against Frontier Airlines, Alleging Discrimination against Pregnant and Nursing Mothers

In December, two separate suits were filed against Frontier Airlines by female flight attendants and pilots who allege the company has routinely discriminated against pregnant and nursing employees at the company. Specifically, the suits allege Frontier required pregnant employees to suspend work duties months before they were scheduled to give birth, forcing employees to use their vacation days in lieu of paid time off and take unpaid maternity leave without Frontier providing alternatives for work. In addition to this, the pilots claim that Frontier discriminated against breastfeeding mothers at work, preventing them from pumping while they were in the air. If that sounds like it's a safety concern, the plaintiffs note that it is common practice for a pilot to take bathroom breaks, leaving the copilot in the cockpit, and that a break for pumping would be no different.

The plaintiffs are joined by the ACLU, the ACLU of Colorado, and Towards Justice, who are arguing that Frontier is violating EEOC regulations as well as Colorado state laws designed to protect pregnant and nursing mothers. 

This is not the first time in recent years that such discrimination cases have hit Frontier, with similar complaints being filed in 2016 and 2017. Other airlines have been confronted with similar accusations of discrimination. airlines, with Delta settling one such case in 2017. 

Despite some headway, gender discrimination at work remains a significant issue for women working in the airline industry, as it is in many industries, and one of the most obvious points of contentions is the rights of pregnant or nursing employees, whose only recourse may be to utilize long-term disability rules to find any relief and job security, which is often seen as demeaning and typically comes with lower pay.

white line

The Week in FFCRA Complaints: Employers Do Not Seem to Understand Mandated Worker Protections

July 31, 2020
Leave
Disability Discrimination
t is starting to seem, from our perspective, that either employers have not been made sufficiently aware of the leave entitled to workers under the FFCRA or that they are willing to risk a lawsuit for wrongful termination.

The Berke-Weiss Law Weekly Roundup: While the Outlook Darkens, We Celebrate Some Small Victories

July 31, 2020
No items found.
The clock has essentially wound down on extending assistance for the 30+ million Americans currently on the unemployment rolls. White House officials and Congressional Democrats remain miles apart, with the latter rejecting a temporary extension of the benefits. There are also huge question marks over issues we focus on, particularly child care and employment law, both of which were in the news this week and are the subject of several of the stories we feature

With the HEALS Act the Fight over Pandemic Lawsuits Takes Center Stage

July 30, 2020
No items found.
Earlier this week, Senate GOP leadership introduced their $1 trillion opening response to the $3 trillion Congressional HEROES Act, originally proposed in May. As we have noted, the signal demand coming from Mitch McConnell’s office is liability protection (the “L” in HEALS) for businesses and health care organizations. Translated, McConnell wants to prevent workers from suing employers if they contract coronavirus at work. And the GOP appears firm that without consensus on this issue, there will be no new stimulus.

Get In Touch

Knowing where to turn in legal matters can make a big difference. Contact our employment lawyers to determine if we can help you.